Coverage % reflecteert het aandeel deterministische registers in de routing matrix sequence. 100% = alle registers in de sequence zijn authoritative data sources (geen AI-grounded). Onderscheid komt zodra routing matrix sequences AI-discovery codes bevatten.
Per business_type heuristic: register-dekking vs. AI discovery.
Sorted by coverage % DESC. Edit rows via SQL on
register_routing_matrix — UI is read-only.
| Business type |
Register sequence |
# Reg |
Det |
Coverage % |
AI discovery % |
Notes |
Coverage labels — what they mean
The pipeline emits up to three coverage:* labels per prospect to flag classification reliability.
They sit alongside icp_segment on each prospect and surface as chips, banner pills, and filter pills.
- coverage:low_confidence
-
Definition. Pipeline assigned
icp_segment via a fuzzy fallback path instead of an exact match — SIB bank-anchor when no scope_gates are declared, GICS sub→group reverse-map, GICS-group exact match while a more specific gics_sub_industry was present but didn't match, or BL-223 numeric-threshold broadening (triage=YES + min_assets_b/min_aum_m/min_employees) without GICS anchor agreement.
Example. A G-SIB ends up matched to a "Banks" segment via the bank-anchor fallback because the tenant's ICP doesn't declare scope_gates on any banking segment.
- coverage:out_of_taxonomy
-
Definition.
business_type is NULL after enrichment. The prospect's actual business type didn't fit any value in VALID_BUSINESS_TYPES (the canonical 47-entry taxonomy), so classification stalled.
Example. An exotic non-bank financial (e.g. a niche payments aggregator or a captive treasury arm) where Gemini couldn't pick a canonical type confidently.
- coverage:hybrid_ambiguous
-
Definition. More than one ICP segment qualified for this prospect via the same matching axis —
include_business_types, gics_sub_industry, gics_industry_group, or sub→group reverse-map. computeIcpSegment's tiebreaker still picks one segment, but the label flags the ambiguity for reviewer confirmation.
Example. A diversified regional bank with retail + wealth + institutional LoBs that fits both a "Full-Service Banks" segment and a "Wealth Management" segment when both list "Regional Bank" under include_business_types.
See SCHEMA.md and CHANGELOG.md S102/S103 entries for the path-based threshold rationale.
Coverage labels refresh on every enrichment, on recalculate-tier (per-prospect, S102 ITEM 2), and on bulk reassess-all-prospects (S103 ITEM 3).